Drop updated Claims CSV to refresh
All months detected automatically.
Your data never leaves your device.
How to export from Google Sheets
  1. Click the Claims tab
  2. File → Download → Comma Separated Values (.csv)
  3. Drag that file onto this page
Report Type
MI Report
Reporting Period
Policy Brand
Feb
2026
01

Portfolio Overview

CommentaryThe portfolio reached 56,000 live policies in June (up from 54,745 in May), with new business sales of 2,566 holding near May's record. The 12-month rolling loss ratio was 45.63%, edging back to the upper end of the 35–45% target band after May's dip. Earned premium grew to £6.01m, keeping pace with portfolio expansion.
Live Policies
52,185
New Business Sales
1,859
Loss Ratio (12-Month Rolling)
45.63%
Target 35–45%
Earned Premium (12-Month Rolling)
£5,663,638
combined portfolio
02

Claims Activity

CommentaryJune saw 256 claims received, up from 228 in May, consistent with the summer peak in riding activity. Accidental Damage again exceeded Theft (153 vs 100). Claims frequency was 4.59%, still below the 5% target though up on May, tracking the seasonal rise in claims against the growing book.

Claims received

203this month
Claims frequency 3.98%
Target < 5%

Claim types Combined only

Type breakdown Combined only

Theft72
Accidental Damage67
Public Liability0
Personal Injury0
Total139

Theft breakdown Combined only

Home vs Away from Home
30%
70%
Home Away from Home
At Home22
Away from Home50
Total Theft72
03

Claims Closed

CommentaryThe acceptance rate was 70.14% and the denial rate fell further to 10.86%, the lowest in the period and comfortably within the 25% threshold. Lock-related declinatures remain the dominant theme — Non Approved Bicycle Lock (5), Locked Incorrectly (4) and Unsecured Bike (4). Average claim duration rose to 17.70 days — still inside the 25-day target but worth monitoring as the aged-claims backlog builds.

Closure outcomes

53.3%
23.0%
16.8%
Accepted Withdrawn Declined
Accepted rate53.27%
Declined rate Target < 25%16.82%
Withdrawn rate23.02%
Avg life cycle / claim duration Target < 25 days6.50 days
Claims re-opened0

Declinature reasons Combined only

04

Open ClaimsNot split by brand

Commentary — WatchOpen claims rose to 268 in June, with the largest group (101) within the normal 0–15 day window and a notable build-up in the 30–60 day band (71). 29 claims are aged over 2 months — broadly stable on May's 27. The aged bucket continues to be driven primarily by the carbon repair route (8–10 weeks per claim) and items awaiting policyholder input:The aged bucket remains driven primarily by the carbon repair pathway and by items awaiting policyholder input — none indicate a process failure.

All open claims

198
0 – 15
Days
86
15 – 30
Days
20
30 – 60
Days
7
2 Months+
6

Aged distribution

05

Financial SummaryNot split by brand

CommentaryTotal claims cost for June was £313,458 across 256 claims, an average of £1,484 per claim — down from May's £1,583 despite more claims, indicating a lower-severity mix. Recoveries of £5,487 were received and outstanding reserves eased to £29,027. No leakage was identified.
Total Claims Payment / Cost
£247,860.00
Average Claims Payment
£1,175.24
per settled claim

Recoveries, Leakage & Reserves

Recoveries received£2,242.68
Leakage identified0
Total outstanding reserves£34,430.07
06

Customer ContactNot split by brand

CommentaryTotal contacts were 8,084 with 2,417 calls received. The 96% answer rate softened slightly and ASA rose to 42 seconds — still inside the 45-second target but the closest it has run to the threshold. Email response time of 156 minutes remains comfortably inside the 4-hour target.
Total Contacts
580
email, chat & calls
Calls Received
230
inbound
Answer Rate
98%
of inbound calls
ASA
29s
avg speed to answer · Target ≤ 45s
Email Response
82.7m
Target ≤ 4 hours (240 min)

Speed of response by channel

Email93.5 minutes
ChatNot available
Calls29 seconds
ASA (Average Speed to Answer) Target ≤ 45s29 seconds
07

Customer ExperienceNot split by brand

CommentaryCustomer satisfaction held at 100% CSAT in June, with Trustpilot steady at 4.5 and Google at 4.7. Satisfaction continues to hold up strongly even as claims decisions are applied rigorously.
CSAT
97%
customer satisfaction
Trustpilot Score
4.5/5.0
★★★★½
Google Score
4.7/5.0
★★★★★
08

Quality MonitoringNot split by brand

Commentary179 claims and 3,986 customers were sampled this month, returning RAG scores of 95.50% and 88.58% respectively. Quality monitoring continues to show no systemic handling issues.
Claims Sampled
75
this month
Claims Avg Score (RAG)
100%
All Green
Customers Sampled
75
this month
Customer Avg Score (RAG)
100%
All Green
09

Fraud DetectionNot split by brand

Commentary1 fraud referral was raised and 1 closed/withdrawn in June. No fraud-related payouts or settlements occurred. The fraud pipeline remains low-volume and well-controlled.
Fraud Referrals
3
referred this month
Fraud Closures / Withdrawn
3
closed or withdrawn
Fraud Recoveries
0 — No Payout
or Settlement
this month
10

Complaints ActivityNot split by brand

Commentary — WatchComplaints logged rose to 10 in June (up from 8 in May). The dominant reason remains claim denial relating to terms and disputed sums (7), with general admin/customer service (2) and a product terms complaint (1) making up the rest. The upheld rate rose to 33.33% (3 of 9 closed) — up from 10% in May and worth monitoring for any pattern.
Complaints Logged
6
logged this month
All Open Complaints
8
currently open
Freq. (Open Claims)
5.04%
% of open claims
Freq. (Active Policies)
0.01%
% of live policies

Open complaints — aged table

1 – 14
Days
4
15 – 28
Days
2
29 – 42
Days
2
43 – 56
Days
0
Complaint reason
Complaint reasonClaim denial —
Terms & disputed sums
Terms & disputed sums / charges5
Claim services — General admin / Customer Service1
Payment — Arrears Related1
Life cycle
Avg life cycle / complaint duration31 days

Complaints closed & outcomes

Total complaints closed5
Closed complaints duration
≤ 3 days0
> 3 days < 8 weeks4
> 8 weeks1
Internal outcome
Not upheld5
Partial upheld0
Upheld0
Complaints upheld %0%

Root cause analysis

Root cause (current month)Lack of Understanding /
Knowledge of Policy
Root cause (YTD)Lack of Understanding /
Knowledge of Policy
Complaint reason (closed)
Claim denial — Terms and disputed
sums / charges

Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS)

FOS referrals received2
FOS decisions received0
FOS upheld %0%
FOS outcome
Not upheld0
Partial upheld0
Upheld0
Status — No FOS decisions upheld against firm

Claims Received 13-MONTH

Spring/summer seasonal peak visible

Loss Ratio (%) WARN 45% / CRIT 55%

12-month rolling — steadily increasing trend

Claims Frequency (%) WARN 5% / CRIT 6%

% of live policies making a claim each month

Closure Outcomes (%) 13-MONTH

Accepted / Withdrawn / Declined — target accepted ≥65%

Earned Premium (£) 12-MONTH ROLLING · 13-MONTH TREND

Combined portfolio — steady growth trajectory

New Customer Sales 13-MONTH

New business policies sold each month

In-Force Customers 13-MONTH

Total live policies at month end

Month-on-Month & Year-on-Year Summary JUN 26 vs MAY 26 & JUN 25

Metric Jun 25 May 26 Jun 26 MoM Δ YoY Δ